<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Generate Success &#187; IT Systems</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.generatesuccess.co.uk/categories/it-systems/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.generatesuccess.co.uk</link>
	<description>Online tips &#38; Advice for Business Success</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 22:19:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>How to Check Web Shops for Basic Security</title>
		<link>http://www.generatesuccess.co.uk/how-to-check-web-shops-for-basic-security/80</link>
		<comments>http://www.generatesuccess.co.uk/how-to-check-web-shops-for-basic-security/80#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 18:44:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MJ Ray</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CRM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT Systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Website Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Website Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eCommerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[certificate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit card]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[payment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ssl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web shop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whois]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.generatesuccess.co.uk/?p=80</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just had a very nice chat on the phone with a man whose first attempt at online shopping seemed to have resulted in a fraudster using his card to buy mobile phone top-ups.  I don&#8217;t understand why he called us (it wasn&#8217;t one of my web shops), but I hope I did the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just had a very nice chat on the phone with a man whose first attempt at online shopping seemed to have resulted in a fraudster using his card to buy mobile phone top-ups.  I don&#8217;t understand why he called us (it wasn&#8217;t one of my web shops), but I hope I did the right thing by directing him back to his credit card company&#8217;s fraud department.</p>
<p>While I was talking to him, I was checking the shop he had problems with.  I wouldn&#8217;t have bought from it.  Here&#8217;s how I checked it:-</p>
<h3>1. Check the Page</h3>
<p>Open the front page of the site in one browser window and then use another window to get to a page that ought to be secure (the payment/checkout page is my usual one).  Look at them both.  Do either of them show any logos from well-known payment (Barclays, RBS, Protx, &#8230;) or security-checking services (thawte &#8211; who else?)?  That&#8217;s not entirely reliable, but it&#8217;s usually a good sign because those companies attack people using their marks without permission.</p>
<p>Look at the payment/checkout page &#8211; does the address in the address bar start &#8220;https&#8221;?  If so, is the padlock in the browser status bar (usually bottom right) closed?  That usually means it&#8217;s encrypted with a Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) certificate.</p>
<h3>2. Check the Certificate</h3>
<p>Open the certificate details.  In Firefox-based browsers, double-click the padlock, then click the &#8220;View Certificate&#8221; button.  Then pick &#8220;Subject&#8221; in the second list box.  Usually, it looks like this:-<br />
<div id="attachment_78" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 282px"><a href="http://www.generatesuccess.co.uk/files/2008/11/cert-basic-half.png"><img src="http://www.generatesuccess.co.uk/files/2008/11/cert-basic-half.png" alt="screenshot" width="272" height="281" class="size-medium wp-image-78" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Basic Certificate Screenshot</p></div><br />
in that case, as long as the &#8220;CN&#8221; (common name) is the webserver you thought you were using and the &#8220;O&#8221; (organisation) and country code (C) make sense, then there&#8217;s nothing wrong.</p>
<p>Some shops now use Extended Validation certificates and give a bit more information.  Here&#8217;s one from a train company:-<br />
<div id="attachment_79" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 282px"><a href="http://www.generatesuccess.co.uk/files/2008/11/cert-plus-half.png"><img src="http://www.generatesuccess.co.uk/files/2008/11/cert-plus-half.png" alt="screenshot" width="272" height="281" class="size-medium wp-image-79" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Extended Validation Screenshot</p></div><br />
In addition to the CN and O, it shows Organisational Unit (OU), Location (L), State (ST) and also other address parts and company number that Firefox doesn&#8217;t display neatly.  This is a bit more reassuring, but also a lot more expensive for the shop owner (around 20 times more, last I checked), so I don&#8217;t blame shops for not using them.</p>
<h3>3. Check the Registrations</h3>
<p>By this point, the payment processing and actual transaction are looking pretty good.  Finally, I check the recipient.  Find the business details on the web shop.  Does it include a geographic address?  If it contains a company registration number, look it up on the <a href="http://www.companies-house.gov.uk/">Companies House</a> website.</p>
<p>Then I find the business details on the domain names &#8211; you can <a href="http://www.coolwhois.com/">use CoolWhois to look up domain names</a>. If any of the addresses or numbers don&#8217;t match (Website, SSL Certificate, Whois), then I call them to ask why their website says they&#8217;re based in Bristol but their domain name is registered to Bolton.  If they don&#8217;t answer messages, or &#8211; worse &#8211; the domain name says &#8220;Non-trading Individual&#8221; and the address has been omitted from the public listing, I give up on them and look for another shop.  There&#8217;s no point securely paying someone that you can never reach if there&#8217;s a problem.</p>
<h3>4. Buy Stuff and Check the Statements</h3>
<p>All being well, I then buy stuff and check my credit card statement each month before I pay it.  I think any web shop owner (or webmaster &#8211; I help some people with this sort of thing) should be taking care of the basics above.  Do your shops measure up?</p>
<p>Despite the above checks, I can only remember not buying something online once in the last year.  A couple of times, I&#8217;ve worked through the above steps and it&#8217;s changed which shop I bought from &#8211; and I&#8217;m pretty sure it saved me from losing £400 on one purchase.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.generatesuccess.co.uk/how-to-check-web-shops-for-basic-security/80/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spammers Silenced by Service Suppliers</title>
		<link>http://www.generatesuccess.co.uk/spammers-silenced-by-service-suppliers/76</link>
		<comments>http://www.generatesuccess.co.uk/spammers-silenced-by-service-suppliers/76#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 13:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MJ Ray</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT Systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eCommerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disconnected]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hosting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mccolo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[volume]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.generatesuccess.co.uk/spammers-silenced-by-service-suppliers/76</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe, like me, you&#8217;ve noticed that you&#8217;ve had less junk email this week and you&#8217;ve been wondering why.  News sites are reporting that a large spammer-friendly hosting service in California has been disconnected by its service providers after they were sent evidence about its activities.  (Check out the &#8220;Next&#8221; links on the report [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe, like me, you&#8217;ve noticed that you&#8217;ve had less junk email this week and you&#8217;ve been wondering why.  News sites are <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/2008/11/major_source_of_online_scams_a.html">reporting</a> that a large spammer-friendly hosting service in California has been disconnected by its service providers after they were sent evidence about its activities.  (Check out the &#8220;Next&#8221; links on the report to see how the story develops.)</p>
<p>For the technically-minded, <a href="http://www.debian-administration.org/users/simonw/weblog/288">Changes in Spam Levels this week Posted by simonw</a> illustrates the level of disruption and may grow an interesting discussion from server managers &#8211; it seems the reduction is less than the 75% reported in some news services, but still significant.</p>
<p><strong>This is great news for all good internet users.</strong>  It&#8217;s disappointing if the spam hosting service won&#8217;t have to pay any of the costs they&#8217;ve inflicted on other computer users in some way.  The only practical negative that I&#8217;ve noticed so far is that much of the stopped spam was pretty easy to identify and filter out, so the reduction in spam reaching my &#8220;unsure&#8221; mailbox hasn&#8217;t been anything like 50%.  Still, less spam hitting the filters means less computer power used, which means less electricity and network data transfer used, which means <strong>lower costs</strong> for us.  Yippee!</p>
<p>And finally, I smiled at this comment over on <a href="http://www.webmasterworld.com/foo/3785412.htm">the WebmasterWorld discussion</a>:-</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Our spam email has dropped so much in the past 2 days that I was beginning to wonder if there was something wrong with our email accounts.&#8221;</p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.generatesuccess.co.uk/spammers-silenced-by-service-suppliers/76/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Webmaster Jargon for Website Owners</title>
		<link>http://www.generatesuccess.co.uk/webmaster-jargon-for-website-owners/75</link>
		<comments>http://www.generatesuccess.co.uk/webmaster-jargon-for-website-owners/75#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 06:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MJ Ray</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Accessibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT Systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Start Up]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Website Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Website Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expat-like]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jargon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[site owner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[webmaster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[website]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xhtml]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.generatesuccess.co.uk/webmaster-jargon-for-website-owners/75</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wrote to a site owner last week and I thought I was writing to a webmaster.  The site owner complained about some of the jargon and, while explaining who I thought I was writing for, I explained some of it because I think more website owners might benefit from these three explanations:-
&#8220;Expat-like terms&#8221; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wrote to a site owner last week and I thought I was writing to a webmaster.  The site owner complained about some of the jargon and, while explaining who I thought I was writing for, I explained some of it because I think more website owners might benefit from these three explanations:-</p>
<p>&#8220;Expat-like terms&#8221; &#8211; made available in a way that is freely sharable, modifiable and redistributable, similar to the Expat software package, whose terms are published at http://www.jclark.com/xml/copying.txt &#8211; this is often used as a clear, simple example for encouraging wide distribution of electronic resources (software).</p>
<p>&#8220;clandestine Google Analytics&#8221; &#8211; Google Analytics is a service from Google, Inc for tracking users through a website in various ways.  I believe the Data Protection Act means that English websites should obtain informed consent from users by publishing a Privacy Policy on their site which discloses what the GA service will be used for and linking through to GA&#8217;s own Privacy Policy.  Some websites attempt to run Google Analytics on users&#8217; computers without explaining why and without any Privacy Policy.  That is what I mean by &#8220;clandestine&#8221;.</p>
<p>&#8220;valid xhtml&#8221; &#8211; validating against the eXtensible HyperText Markup Language standards published by the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) &#8211; the underlying language of the web.  There is a test service provided at http://validator.w3.org/ and passing it is a key stepping stone towards making an accessible website. There&#8217;s not really such a thing as &#8220;invalid xhtml&#8221; &#8211; if it doesn&#8217;t pass validation, it&#8217;s not xhtml.  So I guess I&#8217;m guilty of using a tautology sometimes &#8211; sorry about that.</p>
<p>Is it worthwhile knowing those three phrases?  Are there other key technical phrases which you think site owners should know?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.generatesuccess.co.uk/webmaster-jargon-for-website-owners/75/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How To Avoid 6 Common Website Mistakes That Cost Money</title>
		<link>http://www.generatesuccess.co.uk/how-to-avoid-6-common-website-mistakes-that-cost-money/32</link>
		<comments>http://www.generatesuccess.co.uk/how-to-avoid-6-common-website-mistakes-that-cost-money/32#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 12:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MJ Ray</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT Systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keywords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Start Up]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Website Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Website Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mistakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine optimisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.generatesuccess.co.uk/?p=32</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to a recent article, 6 Common Website Mistakes That Cost Money are:

1. JavaScript or other crawler-unfriendly navigation that may impede indexing

This one is best avoided at design-time, by including Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 Level A in the design brief, but if you&#8217;ve ended up with JavaScript-based navigation on your site (check by doing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to a recent article, 6 Common Website Mistakes That Cost Money are:</p>
<dl>
<dt>1. JavaScript or other crawler-unfriendly navigation that may impede indexing</dt>
<dd>
<p>This one is best avoided at design-time, by including <a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10">Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 Level A</a> in the design brief, but if you&#8217;ve ended up with JavaScript-based navigation on your site (check by doing &#8220;View Source&#8221; and searching for the code for your home page link and so on &#8211; if you can find it, then it&#8217;s probably not javascript) and it&#8217;s based on some template system, a webmaster can probably do a whole-site edit to put the navigation links in the page properly &#8211; or at least add a useful &lt;noscript&gt; tag.</p>
</dd>
<dt>2. Navigation that buries important pages within the site architecture.</dt>
<dd>
<p>The structure of the website&#8217;s files and the structure of the link menus do not need to match, so if there&#8217;s a page that you feel is important, get your webmaster to add it to the navigation links across the whole site.</p>
</dd>
<dt>3. Duplicate &#8220;pages&#8221; getting indexed under multiple URLs. </dt>
<dd>
<p>This usually happens for one of two reasons: one is inappropriately-parked domains, which is mistake 6 below and often fairly easy to fix; the other is a misbehaving web application, which you&#8217;ll need to get a programmer to fix.</p>
<p>You can do a simple test of your web application by starting at your homepage and following links to a particular page; then open a new browser window and try to reach the same page by different links (or a site search) and compare the <a href="http://wiki.ucandoit.org.uk/index.php?title=Firefox#Basic_Firefox_controls">address bars</a> (the bit of your browser showing http://) &#8211; do they match?  If not, you&#8217;ve got this problem.</p>
</dd>
<dt>4. No keyword phrase focus in the content or conversely, keyword phrase stuffing</dt>
<dd>
<p>You can use a good word-counter on the text to see how common different keywords and keyphrases, or use the &#8220;webmaster tools&#8221; section of some search engines to see what they&#8217;re focusing on.</p>
<p>Keyword-stuffing can be fairly easy to see. If you &#8220;View Source&#8221; on a page and there&#8217;s a large block of keyword-intensive text somewhere in it that doesn&#8217;t appear it when viewed in a browser, then it&#8217;s probably stuffing.  Many sites regard stuffing as a sort of spam, so you don&#8217;t want to be found doing this.
</p>
<p>To fix these problems, rewrite the page text appropriately.</p>
</dd>
<dt>5. An optimized home page, but that&#8217;s it</dt>
<dd>
<p>Repeat your checks from problem 4 on a few pages other than the home page to discover whether you suffer from this.  Also, see whether your website statistics show search engine visitors arriving at a variety of different pages (these are sometimes called &#8220;Entry Page&#8221; statistics).</p>
</dd>
<dt>6. Additional domains owned by the company are not properly redirected</dt>
<dd>
<p>If you usually use .co.uk, but you also have a .com domain, try visiting a random page on your website, then click in the address bar and replace the .co.uk with .com &#8211; what happens?</p>
<p>If the page is Not Found, then your domains aren&#8217;t properly redirected and you need a Redirect adding to the second one.</p>
<p>If the page displays but the address doesn&#8217;t change itself back, then your domains are probably pointing at the same webspace but aren&#8217;t properly redirected, which will mean you&#8217;re probably making mistake 3 above. Usually, the simplest way to fix this is with a conditional redirect. On <a href="http://httpd.apache.org/">Apache webservers</a>, you can add a <code>.htaccess</code> file containing something like:-
</p>
<pre>RewriteEngine On
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^www\.yourdomain\.co\.uk$ [NC]
RewriteRule (.*) http://www.yourdomain.co.uk/$1 [R=permanent,L]
</pre>
<p>That even works on BT Business web hosting, by the way.  If it doesn&#8217;t work, try asking your web hosting provider to enable mod_rewrite for you or ask them to suggest how to achieve the same result.</p>
</dd>
</dl>
<p>The above list of mistakes was <a href="http://searchengineland.com/080814-094322.php">published on Search Engine Land</a> last week.  The correction methods are all things used by <a href="http://www.ttllp.co.uk">my webmaster cooperative</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.generatesuccess.co.uk/how-to-avoid-6-common-website-mistakes-that-cost-money/32/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IoD offer Microsoft CRM Solution for UK SMEs</title>
		<link>http://www.generatesuccess.co.uk/iod-offer-microsoft-crm-solution-for-uk-smes/6</link>
		<comments>http://www.generatesuccess.co.uk/iod-offer-microsoft-crm-solution-for-uk-smes/6#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 18:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Terry Lane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CRM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT Systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IoD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.generatesuccess.co.uk/2008/04/14/iod-offer-microsoft-crm-solution-for-uk-smes/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Institute of Directors (IoD) has announced it has setup in partnership with Microsoft to offer its members in the UK a subscription-based version of Microsoft&#8217;s CRM (Customer Relationship Management).
The IoD has 52,000 members in the UK, many of them small to medium businesses who will be able to use this service at a reduced [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.iod.com/is-bin/INTERSHOP.enfinity/eCS/Store/en/-/GBP/IODContentManager-Start;sid=l3oGgBLYO3ncXFrbNoQMFroYBQp1JkGe7Nc=?TemplateName=membership%2fcontent%2fbenefits%2fmem_benefits_partnerships_it_services%2eisml&amp;aff_1=microsoft%20crm&amp;Cache=No" title="Institute of Directors (IoD)">Institute of Directors (IoD)</a> has announced it has setup in partnership with Microsoft to offer its members in the UK a subscription-based version of Microsoft&#8217;s CRM (Customer Relationship Management).</p>
<p>The IoD has 52,000 members in the UK, many of them small to medium businesses who will be able to use this service at a reduced rate.  The Microsoft Dynamics CRM offer will cost IoD members £35 per user, per month while non-members can subscribe for £45 per user, per month.  There is an additional offer of one month&#8217;s service free if they sign up before June 2008.</p>
<p>For more information see <a href="http://www.iod.com/is-bin/INTERSHOP.enfinity/eCS/Store/en/-/GBP/IODContentManager-Start;sid=l3oGgBLYO3ncXFrbNoQMFroYBQp1JkGe7Nc=?TemplateName=membership%2fcontent%2fbenefits%2fmem_benefits_partnerships_it_services%2eisml&amp;aff_1=microsoft%20crm&amp;Cache=No" title="IoD offer Microsoft CRM to UK SME's">IoD Hosted IT Services</a></p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;As the business environment becomes ever more competitive, our members need the tools and support to attract new customers while retaining their existing ones,&#8221; said Andrew Main Wilson, chief operating officer at the IoD.</p></blockquote>
<p>The service will be hosted by Microsoft partner Rackspace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.generatesuccess.co.uk/iod-offer-microsoft-crm-solution-for-uk-smes/6/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

